Just another WordPress site

Another video review controversy? KGC-Dogongjeon with a strange scene, fans are also puzzled… “Send official notice to KOVO”

The match between Korea Expressway Corporation and KGC Ginseng Corporation in the 4th round of the Dodram 2022-23 V-League Women’s Division held at the Gimcheon Indoor Gymnasium on the 6th.

With the Korea Expressway Corporation leading the set score 1-0, the second set was being played. With 20-21, the road construction is one point behind the KGC ginseng construction. Highway construction Jeon Sae-yan stood up to serve. Jeon Sae-yan attempted a floater serve, and the line referee declared it out. Jeon Sae-yan was sorry, and the players of both teams prepared for the next play.

Shim Jae-il, the referee, requested a self-review of the video. In the second half of the set, a reading was requested because the joys and sorrows of both teams could be mixed depending on one point. There was no problem with referee Shim Jae-il’s actions.

Aeja Yoo, referee Jin Byung-woon, and assistant referee Jung Joon-ho reviewed the video and overturned the decision. It is possible that the judgment changes from out to in.

But after that it was a problem. The screen seen by the three people doing the video review was not Jeon Sae-yan’s sub-scene. It was from the previous 19-21 that I saw the back attack scoring scene of Catherine Bell (registered name Catbell) from the road construction.

Let’s look at Jeon Sae-yan’s sub-scene. KGC Ginseng Corporation Chae Seon-ah was following to the end to see Jeon Sae-yan’s serve go out, and Elizabeth Ine Barga (registered name Elisabeth) was also seen near the end line.

However, no one was visible on the screen as seen by the three people doing the video review. I couldn’t even see my feet. If the scene seen by the video reviewers is correct, Elizabeth should have been located there.

Even the direction of the ball was opposite. Ketbell’s attack was directed to the left in the direction the road construction players were looking, while Jeon Sae-yan’s serve was directed to the right. The flow of the ball was completely different, but I didn’t notice it at all. The ball of the Ketbell attack landed on the back of the navy with ‘Dodrammall’ written on it, the same location as shown in the video review. You can see that Jeon Sae-yan’s serve is going to the back of the white with ‘KOLON SPORT’ written on it.

Ko Hee-jin, director of KGC Ginseng Corporation, protested in her own way, but it was not accepted. The game went on as it is. 스포츠토토

Of course, Jeon Sae-yan’s serve could have turned into an in instead of an out. But no one knows whether the serve was really out or in. Because the three members of the video review saw different scenes. Jeon Sae-yan’s sub-in and out scenes did not appear.

Of course, the fans were upset too. There is no other reason why the fans are upset. It’s not that the road construction has been advantageous due to this score, but it’s not about whether the kgc ginseng construction has become a disadvantage. It cannot be said that this goal changed the flow of the game.

Of course, SBS Sports, which showed the previous screen to the judges, is not without fault. However, if a completely different screen came out no matter how hectic it is, it is the reviewers’ job to tell them to show the correct screen, and that part is to say that they are sorry.

In the community, ‘Is it really strange? There were numerous comments such as “I think Elizabeth’s foot should be caught on the screen, but I couldn’t,” and “Isn’t it showing a completely different screen?” If the referee knew where the ball went, this absurd thing would not have happened.

An official from KGC Ginseng Corporation said in a phone call with MK Sports, “Of course, Jeon Sae-yan’s serve could have been in or out. But we all don’t know A completely strange scene came out during the video review. There would have been no problem at all if the three people doing the video review had seen it correctly and judged it correctly. I recognized it right away, and even though I appealed, it was not accepted. It’s frustrating,” he said. It is known that SBS Sports also conveyed an apology to KGC Ginseng Corporation for the part that was read as a catbell attack scene, not a sub scene of Jeon Sae-yan.

Recently, the V-League continues to struggle with video review. On December 27 of last year, an unbelievable mistake occurred in a match between KB Insurance and KEPCO in the men’s division, and the game committee member, referee, and assistant referee were suspended. Also, in the match between Hyundai Capital and OK Financial Group on December 28, Hyundai Capital manager Choi Tae-woong strongly protested against the opponent’s overnet decision and was ejected from the set.

In the men’s match between Korean Air and Hyundai Capital on the 7th, a video review that excited both teams came out. In the second half of the second set, coach Choi Tae-woong requested a video review of the opponent’s four hits. Commissioner Chung Eui-tak, referee Kim Yeong-cheol, and assistant referee Jeon Young-ah looked at one screen and immediately judged, “Four hits are correct.” Then, the Korean Air players jumped up and said no. The three of them looked at another screen again and immediately reversed it, saying, ‘It’s not a four hit’. Of course, director Choi Tae-woong was angry. He raised his voice, saying, “Last time, you said you couldn’t read the trial, so why are you going back and forth?”

Of course, in the KOVO regulations, there is no provision that ‘cannot be overturned after being judged through video review’. However, the current inconsistent decision is only giving each team confusion. Other games say no, today they say yes. That’s why everyone has no choice but to be sensitive.

Fans’ disappointment is growing.

KGC Ginseng Corporation plans to send an official letter of protest to KOVO on the 9th.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *